Ma%20le%20ripetenze%20no

Nei%20prossimi%20incontri%20MPI-sindacati%20sulle%20riduzioni%20di%20organico%20volute%20dalla%20legge%20finanziaria%20non%20si%20potr%E0%20non%20parlare%20anche%20della%20previsione%20di%20tagli%20che%20dovrebbero%20derivare%20da%20un%20decremento%20delle%20ripetenze%20nei%20primi%20due%20anni%20degli%20istituti%20superiori%20%28comma%20605%2C%20lett.%20a%29.%3Cbr%3E%0D%0ALa%20norma%20sar%E0%20probabilmente%20messa%20in%20disparte%20non%20solo%20per%20la%20sua%20poco%20credibilit%E0%20%28si%20pu%F2%20bocciare%20poco%20o%20tanto%20per%20legge%3F%29%2C%20ma%20perch%E9%20ha%20previsto%20un%20taglio%20di%20posti%20sovrastimato%2C%20quasi%20doppio%20di%20quello%20che%20effettivamente%20si%20potrebbe%20praticare.%3Cbr%3E%0D%0AInfatti%2C%20mentre%20il%20numero%20degli%20studenti%20iscritti%20e%20delle%20classi%20frequentate%20nel%202005-2006%20%E8%20esatto%2C%20quello%20dei%20ripetenti%20dei%20primi%20due%20anni%20di%20corso%20%E8%20quasi%20doppio%20di%20quello%20effettivamente%20registrato%20dallo%20stesso%20ministero%20della%20Pubblica%20Istruzione%20%28185.002%20invece%20di%2095.386%29.%3Cbr%3E%0D%0ASeguendo%20la%20procedura%20di%20calcolo%20contenuta%20nella%20relazione%20tecnica%20alla%20legge%20finanziaria%2C%20la%20previsione%20di%20riduzione%20del%2010%25%20delle%20ripetenze%20comporterebbe%20un%20risparmio%20non%20di%20644%20classi%2C%20come%20erroneamente%20calcolato%2C%20bens%EC%20di%20332.%3Cbr%3E%0D%0AConseguentemente%2C%20il%20numero%20di%20posti%20di%20insegnante%20da%20ridurre%20non%20dovrebbe%20essere%20di%201.455%20%28come%20scritto%20nella%20relazione%20tecnica%29%20ma%20750.%20E%20il%20numero%20di%20posti%20di%20personale%20Ata%20da%20ridurre%2C%20anzich%E9%20425%20dovrebbe%20essere%20alla%20fine%20di%20219%20unit%E0.%3Cbr%3E%0D%0ASi%20dovr%E0%20applicare%20la%20norma%20di%20salvaguardia%20anche%20sugli%20errori%20di%20calcolo%3F%20%3Cbr%3E%0D%0A